T +44 (0)20 7632 8500
E clerksroom@11kbw.com

Menu

Search Results for: Self-study resource approved C-S4CFI-2302 Exam Questions 👬 The page for free download of ➄ C-S4CFI-2302 🡄 on  www.pdfvce.com  will open immediately đŸ‘©Examcollection C-S4CFI-2302 Vce

Barrister

Christopher Knight

Christopher is a well-established junior with a broad public law practice and a particular specialism in media and privacy law, the devolution settlement and in Brexit-related matters. He has appeared in the most significant constitutional law cases of the last few years, including the Article 50 Brexit case, the Scottish independence referendum reference, the Rwanda deportation challenge and the dispute over the prorogation of Parliament. He has acted as sole advocate before the High Court, Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the Court of Justice of the EU and acts for Government, individual claimants, commercial clients and a wide variety of public sector bodies. He is also a leading expert in information and data protection law, having acted in hundreds of such cases and advising on the most complex policy and operational issues arising in those areas of law. Christopher is a highly regarded academic writer, publishing widely in journals and is the co-author of the leading textbook Bradley, Ewing & Knight on Constitutional and Administrative Law (2022, Pearson). He is an editor of the White Book and a member of the Editorial Committee of Public Law.

Christopher is a member of the Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel. He won the Legal 500 Human Rights and Public Law junior of the year award in 2022 and has been nominated in equivalent categories in previous and subsequent years. He is ranked as a Band 1 junior by the directories in Administrative & Public Law and EU Law, and a Star Individual in Data Protection. The directories have recently described him as: the “king of data rights” (Legal 500, 2021), “utterly first class” (Legal 500, 2020), “a superstar of the data and privacy world” (Legal 500, 2024) and having “a brain the size of a planet, and is very impressive and calm and collected in court” (Chambers & Partners, 2021). Clients have commented that: “Chris is an extraordinarily brilliant lawyer. He is steeped in public law, his drafting is so precise and beautifully written and his judgement is absolutely spot on” (Chambers & Partners, 2024).

Read More
Barrister

Jonathan Moffett

Jonathan is an acknowledged expert in public law, and has been described by the legal directories as “one of the best”, combining “the perfect blend of razor-sharp intellect, strategic oversight and excellent client skills”.

Jonathan’s practice has a particular emphasis on the fields of regulatory law, local government law, human rights, education law, environmental and planning law, and health and community care law. He has a huge amount of experience in dealing with claims for judicial review, and he is ranked by the legal directories as a leading silk in administrative and public law, local government law, education law, and civil liberties and human rights. Jonathan’s recent high profile cases include the High Court challenges to the government’s net zero policies, the Supreme Court ruling on challenges to policies, the challenge to the teaching of Relationships and Sexuality Education in Wales, the inquest into the contribution of air pollution to the tragic death of Ella Addo-Kissi-Debra, and the judicial review concerning the powers of local authorities to hold remote meetings after the pandemic.

Jonathan represents government bodies on some of their most important and difficult cases, and he is on the Welsh Government’s panel of KCs, the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s A panel of counsel and the NPS panel of counsel instructed by Welsh public bodies.

Jonathan sits as a Deputy High Court Judge and as a Recorder in the Crown Court. He is also Chair of the Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association, the editor of the sections on judicial review in The White Book, and co-author of a leading public law practitioners’ text, Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure (OUP), a new edition of which is due to be published in 2024.

Read More
Barrister

Jonathan Auburn

Jonathan is a KC practicing in the fields of public law / judicial review, local government, education law, community care, healthcare law, mental capacity, and disciplinary law. He also regularly undertakes investigations on behalf of public sector clients. Throughout his practice he has been recommended by the legal directories as a leading practitioner in five categories: administrative and public law, local government law, community care education law, and mental capacity / Court of Protection.

Jonathan is co-author of OUP’s highly-rated text on public law, ‘Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure (2nd ed forthcoming 2025), as well as writing for the White Book, Phipson on Evidence, and the LexisNexis Education Law Handbook. Jonathan is a former member of the Attorney General’s A-panel of advocates.

Jonathan is originally from Australia, where he graduated with first class honours, before completing a BCL and D.Phil at Magdalen College, Oxford. Prior to coming to the bar he worked in Australia as a solicitor and as a judicial assistant in Australia’s highest court, the High Court of Australia, and in the UK as judicial assistant to Lord Woolf MR.

Read More
Barrister

Philip Kolvin

Philip is one of the country’s most eminent licensing KCs. His practice spans all fields of licensing, including alcohol and entertainment, gambling, sexual entertainment, taxis, sport, caravans and the security industry. He acts across the board for national and independent operators, national regulators, local authorities and local residents and community groups.

He has been ranked in the top tier for licensing in the Legal 500 and Chambers directories for many years. As one client put it, “There isn’t anyone who comes close to his stature” (Legal 500).

He is a Patron and former Chair of the Institute of Licensing, the professional body for licensing practitioners, and an Associate Fellow of Westminster University’s Centre for Law, Society and Popular Culture.

Read More
Barrister

Tom Cross

Tom Cross is one of the leading juniors at the UK Bar. He is highly ranked by each of the principal legal directories in seven areas: Administrative & Public Law, Civil Liberties & Human Rights, Education, Professional Discipline, Local Government, Employment, and Data Protection.

Quotations provided to the 2023 directories said he is: “the best junior at the public law bar, without question”, “operating well beyond his call”, and “one of those juniors who’ll be a KC very soon”; “the one you want to go to is Tom Cross”.

He was nominated UK Public Law Junior of the Year 2022, and Public Services and Charities Junior of the Year 2023. He was previously UK Public Law Junior of the Year 2018 (Legal 500) and UK Employment Law Junior of the Year 2019 (Chambers & Partners).

His most recent instructions include matters as varied and high-profile as: defending Katharine Birbalsingh’s ban on prayer rituals at Michaela School, the “Hogwarts Express” judicial review (West Coast Railway Company), the Supreme Court claim by Deliveroo Riders to worker rights (IWGB), the British Generic Manufacturers Association’s challenge to the negotiation of a new scheme for the supply of medicines to the NHS, the Part 8 claim on whether mentally unwell patients could be sectioned following “remote” assessments (Derbyshire NHS Trust), Lucy Letby’s Article 6 claim to an additional legally aided advocate for her defence at her criminal trial; the lockdown judicial review (Dolan); advising on what constitutes non-discriminatory pornography in prisons; the dispute about Manchester United’s away supporter allowance at Stamford Bridge; the challenge to the Census 2021 guidance (Fair Play for Women); Charlie Hughes’ battle for medicinal cannabis on the NHS; the challenge to Bermuda’s prohibition of same-sex marriage (Ferguson); the claim by Sir Philip Rutnam against the Home Secretary; the dispute between Christ Church and its Dean; the Article 50 / Gina Miller litigation; the challenge to the Parole Board’s decision to release the “Black Cab Rapist” (DSD); the school sex segregation case (Al-Hijrah), representing Strictly Come Dancing Professional Kristina Rihanoff in pregnancy discrimination proceedings, and acting in claims concerning abortion rights, the crime of female genital mutilation, and the recovery of silver from a shipwreck which was sunk during World War Two in the Indian Ocean.

He acts for claimants, defendants, and other parties, principally in litigation. His private and public sector clients range from major companies to private individuals, UK and foreign governments, and regulatory bodies. He is Counsel to the Crown in civil cases (A Panel) and is one of the Counsel to the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

Read More
Barrister

Jason Coppel

Jason Coppel’s practice focuses on public law, procurement law and information law, with particular emphasis on EU law and human rights issues. He has appeared in many of the leading public and procurement law cases of recent years, including the Article 50 TEU litigation, Gina Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Gardner v Secretary of State for Health (on discharge of hospital patients into care homes at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic) Camelot UK Ltd v the Gambling Commission (on the award of the licence to operate the National Lottery), British Gas v Secretary of State for Energy Securing (the subsidy control challenge to the sale of Bulb Energy) and R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust (prohibition of prayer rituals on school premises).  He is ranked by the directories as a leading KC in public law, human rights, EU law and procurement and subsidy control law.  He is a member of the General Appeals Panel of the Football Association and the Independent Oversight Panel of the Premier League. He was a Deputy High Court Judge between 2018-2024.

Jason was the Chambers & Partners Public Law and Human Rights Silk of the Year 2022.

He was The Times “Lawyer of the Week” in February 2016, after acting for criminal duty solicitors in a successful challenge to new legal aid arrangements, and again, recently, on 2 May 2024, in recognition of his work on the Michaela School case.  You can read the Times profiles here and here.

 

Read More
Barrister

Stephen Kosmin

“He had everything at his fingertips. He is a polished all round advocate. I can’t think of any weaknesses. He stood out as someone who has ability beyond their years or call.” Chambers and Partners

“First-class attention to detail, and impressive all-round skills. As well as knowing the law inside out, Stephen is a confident and impressive advocate. Judges listen.” Legal 500

Stephen Kosmin specialises in administrative and public law, procurement law, financial services, and information and data protection law. He is ranked by both Chambers and Partners and the Legal 500 in each of those areas of practice. Stephen is additionally ranked by the Legal 500 in local government law and by Chambers and Partners in civil liberties and human rights. In August 2023, Stephen was appointed to the Attorney General’s A Panel.

Stephen has wide-ranging trial and appellate court experience, particularly in high-value and multi-party disputes. Recently, Stephen has appeared:

  • in the Supreme Court in R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3), acting for the appellant; in Cox v Ministry of Justice, acting for the respondent; and in Independent Workers Union of Great Britain v Central Arbitration Committee and Roofoods Ltd (t/a Deliveroo), acting for the intervener;
  • in the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v AT (European Union law, Universal Credit), acting for the Secretary of State; in Cobalt Data Centre 2 LLP v HMRC, acting for HMRC; in R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, acting for the Surveillance Camera Commissioner; in Kimathi v Foreign and Commonwealth Office, acting for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office; and in R (Tesfay) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, acting for the Home Secretary;
  • in the Administrative Court in public law cases, including R (Charles Street Securities Europe LLP) v Financial Ombudsman Service; R (Get Real Marketing Company Ltd) v Culture Recovery Board; R (Police Superintendents’ Association) v HM Treasury; and R (Enterprise Managed Service Ltd) v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government;
  • in the Technology and Construction Court in procurement claims, including James Waste Management LLP v Essex County Council; Alstom Transport UK Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd; R (Good Law Project) v Prime Minister; Altiatech Ltd v Birmingham City Council; and Kenson Contractors (Benington) Ltd v Haringey Ltd;
  • in the King’s Bench Division in Prismall v Google UK Ltd; Seadrill Ghana Operations v Tullow Ghana Ltd; and Berkeley Burke Sipp Administration v Financial Ombudsman Service;
  • in the Upper Tribunal and First-tier Tribunal in tax disputes and information law cases, including Ticketmaster UK Ltd v Information Commissioner; Ofqual v Information Commissioner; Maurizi v Information Commissioner; and Myhill v General Medical Council.

Stephen also has considerable experience and expertise of public international law, arbitral proceedings, and negotiations.

Read More
Barrister

Joanne Clement

Joanne took silk in 2022, practicing in all areas of public law and human rights law. Her practice extends from commercial judicial review to claims raising significant constitutional and human rights issues. She is also an expert in local government, and health, community care and mental capacity law, as well as in the field of procurement law and education law. Prior to taking silk, Joanne was a highly rated junior, and was top ranked by the legal directories in six practice areas (Administrative & Public Law, Civil Liberties & Human Rights, Local Government, Education, Community Care and Court of Protection).

She was the Chambers and Partners Public Law and Human Rights Junior of the Year in 2018/19. Recent cases include R (Article 39) v Secretary of State for Education [2022] EWHC 589 (Admin) (challenge to statutory instrument banning use of unregulated accommodation for young children); R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 360 (Admin) (Parliamentary privilege and public law challenges to decisions resulting in primary legislation) and In Re T  [2021] UKSC 35; [2021] 3 WLR 643 (Article 5, secure accommodation and deprivation of liberty of children).

Prior to taking silk, Joanne was a member of the Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel for 15 years, having most recently been a member of the “A” Panel of Counsel. Joanne was also a member of the Welsh Government’s Panel of Junior Counsel, and has now been appointed to the Welsh Government’s KC Panel.  Joanne has led teams in the Supreme Court, and has regularly appeared as leading or sole counsel in the Court of Appeal, the Administrative Court, the Family Division/Court of Protection and various tribunals.

She is described the directories as, “Undoubtedly one of the cleverest individuals at the Bar”,  “An outstanding barrister. She is so down to earth and approachable. Very clear and fantastic on her feet. Her drafting is just on a different level”,  “A leader in the field” , “She can take command of a tough case and handle it with calm expertise”  “An excellent advocate and an experienced public lawyer. She’s direct, clear and very precise. She has the respect of the judiciary” and “
a complete superstar and knows community care law back to front”.

Joanne sits as a Recorder in the Crown Court (South Eastern Circuit)

Read More
Barrister

Patrick Halliday

Patrick Halliday is a highly regarded specialist in procurement and employment law. His practice also covers public law; pensions law (focusing on public sector schemes, discrimination and public law aspects of pensions); and commercial disputes involving former employees and directors.

Patrick is a member of the Attorney General’s “A Panel” of counsel.

He is recommended by the legal directories in four practice areas: procurement; employment; administrative & public; and pensions. Chambers & Partners, the Legal 500 and Who’s Who Legal say the following about him:

“a brilliant barrister with a ferociously insightful mind, who is enormously client-friendly and reassuringly calm at all times”;

“a star 
 smart, insightful, diligent and thorough”;

“brilliant barrister with whom instructing solicitors enjoy working very much”;

“extraordinarily incisive and clear in his analysis”;

“calm and persuasive demeanour that works wonders with judges”

“extraordinarily capable barrister with an incredible work ethic 
  patient with everyone, despite being leagues ahead in his thinking”

“excellent in cross-examination.”

In June 2021, he was named “Barrister of the Week” in the Lawyer magazine.

Read More
Barrister

Julian Milford

Julian Milford was called to the bar in 2000. His main areas of practice are public law, information law, and employment law. Julian undertakes advisory and judicial review work in the field of public and constitutional law for central and local government, other public authorities, and individuals, and has been instructed for and against government on issues of major public importance. He advises on and acts in cases concerning information rights in the civil courts and statutory tribunals, and has been instructed in significant data protection and freedom of information cases, having a particular specialism in national security cases and proceedings in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. He acts in employment cases in the civil courts and Employment Tribunal, and has experience across the Tribunal’s statutory jurisdiction, including extensive experience of acting in large-scale discrimination/equal pay claims and industrial action cases. His experience in discrimination law and the breadth of his expertise makes him well placed to undertake investigations and inquiries in the employment or regulatory context. He also practices in the field of education law, particularly in cases involving higher education institutions.

Read More

More about us