Search Results for: Latest Upload NetSuite-Administrator Detailed Study Dumps - NetSuite NetSuite-Administrator Valid Exam Preparation: NetSuite Certified Administrator 🤔 Open ➽ www.pdfvce.com 🢪 and search for 「 NetSuite-Administrator 」 to download exam materials for free ↔Valid Dumps NetSuite-Administrator Sheet

Barrister

Jason Coppel

Jason Coppel’s practice focuses on public law, procurement law and information law, with particular emphasis on EU law and human rights issues. He has appeared in many of the leading public and procurement law cases of recent years, including the Article 50 TEU litigation, Gina Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, Gardner v Secretary of State for Health (on discharge of hospital patients into care homes at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic) Camelot UK Ltd v the Gambling Commission (on the award of the licence to operate the National Lottery), British Gas v Secretary of State for Energy Securing (the subsidy control challenge to the sale of Bulb Energy) and R (TTT) v Michaela Community Schools Trust (prohibition of prayer rituals on school premises).  He is ranked by the directories as a leading KC in public law, human rights, EU law and procurement and subsidy control law.  He is a member of the General Appeals Panel of the Football Association and the Independent Oversight Panel of the Premier League. He was a Deputy High Court Judge between 2018-2024.

Jason was the Chambers & Partners Public Law and Human Rights Silk of the Year 2022.

He was The Times “Lawyer of the Week” in February 2016, after acting for criminal duty solicitors in a successful challenge to new legal aid arrangements, and again, recently, on 2 May 2024, in recognition of his work on the Michaela School case.  You can read the Times profiles here and here.

 

Read More
Barrister

Julian Milford

Julian Milford was called to the bar in 2000. His main areas of practice are public law, information law, and employment law. Julian undertakes advisory and judicial review work in the field of public and constitutional law for central and local government, other public authorities, and individuals, and has been instructed for and against government on issues of major public importance. He advises on and acts in cases concerning information rights in the civil courts and statutory tribunals, and has been instructed in significant data protection and freedom of information cases, having a particular specialism in national security cases and proceedings in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. He acts in employment cases in the civil courts and Employment Tribunal, and has experience across the Tribunal’s statutory jurisdiction, including extensive experience of acting in large-scale discrimination/equal pay claims and industrial action cases. His experience in discrimination law and the breadth of his expertise makes him well placed to undertake investigations and inquiries in the employment or regulatory context. He also practices in the field of education law, particularly in cases involving higher education institutions.

Read More
Barrister

Andrew Sharland

Andrew specializes in public law, public inquiries and investigations, public procurement and information law. Andrew has a broad public law practice with a particular emphasis on the fields of human rights, health and community care law, local government, planning and environmental law, professional discipline and regulatory law and education law. Andrew acts for individuals, charities, companies, NGOs, central and local government bodies and foreign governments in domestic and European courts. Until he took Silk in 2018, Andrew was a long-standing member of the Attorney General’s A panel of junior counsel, representing government bodies on some of their most important and difficult cases.

Andrew is ranked by the legal directories as a leading Silk in administrative and public law, local government law, public inquiries and inquests, education, community care, and information law. In 2020, Andrew was nominated for ‘Public Law Silk of the year’ by The Legal 500.

Andrew is a co-author of the leading practitioners’ textbook, Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure (OUP, 2013) (2nd edn forthcoming in 2025)

Andrew is also a contributor to R McManus KC, Education and the Courts, P Coppel KC, Information Rights and Atkins Court Forms on Human Rights. Andrew sits part-time as a recorder in the Crown Court.

Read More
Barrister

Patrick Halliday

Patrick Halliday is a highly regarded specialist in procurement and employment law. His practice also covers public law; pensions law (focusing on public sector schemes, discrimination and public law aspects of pensions); and commercial disputes involving former employees and directors.

Patrick is a member of the Attorney General’s “A Panel” of counsel.

He is recommended by the legal directories in four practice areas: procurement; employment; administrative & public; and pensions. Chambers & Partners, the Legal 500 and Who’s Who Legal say the following about him:

“a brilliant barrister with a ferociously insightful mind, who is enormously client-friendly and reassuringly calm at all times”;

“a star … smart, insightful, diligent and thorough”;

“brilliant barrister with whom instructing solicitors enjoy working very much”;

“extraordinarily incisive and clear in his analysis”;

“calm and persuasive demeanour that works wonders with judges”

“extraordinarily capable barrister with an incredible work ethic …  patient with everyone, despite being leagues ahead in his thinking”

“excellent in cross-examination.”

In June 2021, he was named “Barrister of the Week” in the Lawyer magazine.

Read More
Barrister

Julian Blake

Julian is highly recommended in all the leading legal directories, with Chambers and Partners commenting: “Julian Blake is very solid. He presents difficult cases like it’s the most sensible thing you’ve heard in your life.”

The directories have consistently observed that he is able to “explain very complex areas of law in a very straightforward manner”, providing “clear, user-friendly advice”. He has been recommended as “the most user-friendly barrister” who is, “extremely personable and great to work with”. Julian is currently shortlisted for the ‘Junior of the Year’ award in the Inquests and Public Inquiries category of the Chambers and Partners UK Bar Awards 2024.

Julian acts in a wide range of public law, media and information law, technology, healthcare and commercial law fields. As an experienced member of the Attorney General’s ‘A’ Panel of Counsel, Julian regularly acts for HM Government in some of its most complex and sensitive cases including in several challenges before the Supreme Court.

Recent highlights include representing the Prime Minister and Department of Health and Social Care in a challenge by the Good Law Project to appointments made during the COVID-19 Pandemic, representing the Chief Medical Officer in the subsequent COVID-19 Inquiry and appearing as Counsel to the Inquiry in the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry.

Read More
Barrister

Simon Devonshire

Simon was called in 1988 and took silk in 2009. He is a leading KC practicing in all areas of statutory and contractual/commercial employment law, but with a particular emphasis on (i) inter-business competition issues (including confidential information, restrictive covenants and the poaching of employees in unlawful team moves), (ii) employee/business owner fraud, (iii) the attempted diversion of business opportunities by employee fiduciaries, and (iv) whistle-blowing, discrimination and TUPE disputes. He also has considerable experience in the sports forum, in disputes between LLP members, in the management and control of repeated/vexatious litigation, and in the conduct of internal investigations.

According to recent directory recommendations, “his advocacy skills, robustness and tenacity always places the client in the strongest position”, he is “incredibly bright and hugely persuasive in court”, and he “brings his strong intellect to every detailed corner of a complex case”.  He is a “go-to silk for non-compete disputes” and “provides excellent client service … very responsive and happy to roll up his sleeves in a case.

Read More
Barrister

Zac Sammour

Zac has a versatile practice encompassing commercial, employment, data protection, defamation and privacy, public, public international and sport law. He is often instructed in cases at the intersect of those areas, and by clients whose business or wider interests straddle them.

The breadth of Zac’s practice is reflected in the Courts and tribunals in which he appears. He has appeared in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, all divisions of the High Court, the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the Competition Appeal Tribunal, a number of specialist first-tier tribunals (employment, information law and immigration and asylum) and sports disciplinary bodies. Zac has also appeared in the International Court of Justice.

Zac is ranked as a leading junior by Legal 500 in four of his practice areas: employment, data protection law, defamation and privacy and sport. He is ranked by Chambers & Partners in employment and data protection. He has been described in the directories as a “star junior” and “superb barrister”, “an all-around intellectual and practical talent” who “demonstrates abilities well beyond his year of call” and has a “brilliant mind”.

Zac is comfortable working as sole counsel or as part of a larger team. His advocacy is consistently highlighted in the directories, where he has been described as “a superb advocate”, “a very effective cross-examiner” who “makes cogent oral submissions which effectively bring out the strength of his case”.

Read More
Barrister

Heather Emmerson

Heather Emmerson practises in the areas of public law, regulatory law, professional discipline, data protection and information law. She is ranked as a leading junior in Chambers and Partners across all main areas of her practice and described as “fiercely bright”, “a genuine rising star” and “a consummate professional”.  Heather has appeared before a wide range of courts, tribunals and public inquiries and is regularly instructed in proceedings before the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Read More
Barrister

Aileen McColgan

Aileen is recommended by the directories as a leading silk in administrative & public law, education law, civil liberties & human rights, employment law and independent investigations. She has particular interests in discrimination/equality and human rights law, including the law relating to information/freedom of expression, and extensive experience in conducting independent investigations for a variety of bodies including FTSE 100 and multinational companies, local authorities and national charities, law firms, political parties and universities.

Aileen’s interests in human rights and discrimination law have been reflected in litigation and investigations concerning the boundaries between free speech and alleged antisemitism and transphobia as well as between religious freedom and anti- discrimination rights. She has extensive experience on advising in relation to trans-related issues in the context of education, employment and policing. Recent cases include Forstater v CGD Europe & Ors (on discrimination and gender critical beliefs), R (AI) v London Borough of Wandsworth (on the PSED and the provision of education to trans students) and R (AB) v A county council & Anor (a challenge brought by a teacher in relation to a child’s social transition at school). Aileen has also advised many organisations on the investigation and management of complaints of sexual harassment/ assault and harassment/ bullying, including at the highest levels.

Aileen is recommended by Chambers & Partners (2024) as ‘very responsive and very good with clients… tactically astute and able to cut through large quantities of information and provide clear, strategic and commercial advice quickly’; ‘A great advocate to have in your corner’; ‘really able to think outside of the box’’; ‘exceptional in every aspect of advice and client relationships… a true expert’. The Legal 500 currently recommends her ‘an expert on discrimination law’ whose ‘no- nonsense approach gives confidence to the client’, and as having ‘an encyclopaedic knowledge and really in-depth understanding of the law of equality and discrimination as applicable to schools’.

Previous editions have praised Aileen as ‘a top-class practitioner’, ‘an excellent KC and a pleasure to work with’ (Chambers & Partners 2003) and ‘a leading lawyer [whose] understanding of the key issues and fundamental principles really sets her apart’ (Legal 500 2023); ‘a fierce advocate’ who ‘distils complicated issues into manageable areas … has a phenomenal ability to cut through swathes of information to get to the heart of the matter and has a genuine partnership approach’ (Legal 500, 2022), and as having a ‘stellar academic background [which] means that she is totally on top of the law, and [who] draws on that fountain of knowledge to provide comprehensive but commercial advice’ (Chambers & Partners 2022).

Aileen has a distinguished history as an academic and is internationally recognised as a leading academic in discrimination, equality and human rights law. Her academic work has been cited in the ECHR and the domestic courts. She is the former Chair of the Human Rights Lawyers Association (2019-2021); a current or former member of the editorial committees of Public Law, European Human Rights Law Review, International Journal of Discrimination and the Law and Education Law Reports and former Executive Committee Member of the Industrial Law Society. She has been trustee of the British Institute of Human Rights and was until 2016 the UK’s National Expert on the European Networks of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality and of Experts in the Non-discrimination Field. She has published very widely on human rights, discrimination and employment law.

Read More
Barrister

Peter Oldham

Peter is a well-known practitioner advising and litigating in public, local government, education, employment, procurement and state aid law, and has always appeared as a leading silk in the directories.   He also conducts investigations and expert determinations.  He is Legal 500’s Government and Third Sector Silk of the Year 2022.

Peter regularly advises and appears in the cutting edge cases in his fields.  Recent local authority litigation includes R (City of Wolverhampton and six other LAs) v Home Secretary (LA challenge to Home Office’s asylum dispersal policy, July 2022), R (AB) v Slough BC (challenge to closure of LA day centre for disabled adults, July 2022), R (RhAG) v Neath Port Talbot CBC (Welsh language and school reorganisation, Oct 2022), R (YA) v Swansea Independent Appeal Panel (school exclusions, Feb 2022), R (KD) v Leicestershire CC (school transport, disability and human rights, July 2021), R (Herts CC and others) v SoS for DHCLG (lawfulness of remote LA meetings, May 2021), R (MI) v Waltham Forest BC (cuts to SENs budgets, July 2020SFM Ltd v Christ the King College and Isle of Wight Council (lawfulness of maintained school leases and borrowing, May 2020), R (LF) v Bucks CC (reorganisation of children’s centres, July 2019) and R (Fire Authorities) v Home Secretary (fire authority reorganisation and police and crime commissioners, July 2019), R (Various Fire Authorities) v Home Secretary (police and crime commissioners, July 2019), Nat Union of Professional Foster Carers v Certification Officer (foster carers, union recognition and human rights, EAT, July 2019), Jones v Swansea CC (teachers’ SEN allowances, May 2019), R (Britwell PC) v Slough BC (abolition of parishes, April 2019), R (Wycombe DC) v SoS (unitary LA reorganisation, Mar 2019), R (RB) v Neath Port Talbot CBC (school closure and Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, March 2019), R (RD) v Worcestershire CC (reorganisation of early years provision, Feb 2019), Addison Lee v Gascoigne (gig economy, Mar 2019),  Marston Hldgs v Ministry of Justice (procurement claim, Nov 2018),  R (KE) v Bristol CC (LA budgets, Aug 2018), R (WX) v Northants CC (libraries and children’s centres, Aug 2018), R (Labour Party) v SoS (lawfulness of election rules, Apr 2018).

Read More